Estate Planning Gone Wrong: James Gandolfini’s Insufficient Estate Plan Cost Him Millions
Posted On:
|
Author:
|
|
According to recent reports, James Gandolfini is the most recent in a long list of celebrities whose lack of proper planning has resulted in millions of dollars being paid to unintended recipients. In Gandolfini’s case, the IRS was the big winner.
At the time of his death, Gandolifini’s estate was worth approximately $70 million. The good news was that he attempted to put together an estate plan to include presumably the most important people in his life – his wife, children, and sisters. The bad news is that the basic plan he had did not take advantage of some well-established estate planning techniques that could have cut down his tax bill considerably.
The Will appeared to be drafted with very simple provisions leaving the first $1.6 million to various relatives and friends and making provisions for his personal property and land in Italy. The remainder was split as follows: 30% each to his two sisters, 20% to his current wife, and 20% to his daughter. His son received the proceeds of a life insurance policy. While this appears to have been a good plan, it exposes his estate to considerable tax liability because he didn’t take advantage of the unlimited marital deduction and other potential tax saving techniques.
In 2013, up to $5.25 million of an estate’s assets are exempt from federal taxation thanks to the American Taxpayer Relief Act passed earlier this year. For amounts in excess of the exemption level, which is adjusted annually for inflation, the top federal estate tax rate is 40 percent. Transfers from one spouse to the other, however, are typically tax-free.
Gandolfini, however, left approximately 80% of his estate to beneficiaries other than his spouse, causing that portion to be subject to federal estate tax.
His estate will also have to pay estate taxes to New York, his state of residence, which, unlike most states, does not mirror the federal exemption and exempts only the first $1 million from estate taxes.
One might argue that this was all by design, as Gandolfini may have chosen not to use his marital exemption because his current wife was not the mother of all of his children. There are, however, estate planning techniques that continue to minimize the tax bill while taking into account the fact that the decedent may have children from a previous relationship. Additionally, there are still other techniques that may have allowed him to pass assets to his other beneficiaries while minimizing the tax bill on that end too.
These types of mistakes are not only a threat to the extremely wealthy, as in this case, but they can also affect those of us with a much smaller estate as well. Lack of proper planning happens at all levels, making it extremely valuable for all families to work with an attorney who specializes in this practice area.
Recent Articles
Categories
- Arbitration
- Best Lawyers in America
- Business Law
- Business Litigation
- Chardon Attorneys
- Chardon Lawyers
- Charity
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Cleveland Attorneys
- Cleveland Lawyers
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Court Cases
- Criminal Law
- Defense Attorneys
- Defense Verdicts
- Divorce Attorney
- Divorce Law
- Divorce Lawyers
- Divorce Process
- Employer Liability
- Employment Lawyers
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Family Law Attorney
- FMLA Eligibility
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Law
- Lawsuits
- Legal Advice
- Mineral Rights Lawyer
- News
- Ohio Oil and Gas
- Ohio Super Lawyers
- Oil & Gas Law
- Oil & Gas Update
- Oil and Gas Attorneys
- Personal Injury
- Personal Injury Lawyers
- Practice News
- Real Estate Lawyers
- Trial Lawyers
- Workers Compensation
- Zoning Lawyers
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2009
- June 2009
- May 2006