Obtaining a Variance
Posted On:
|
Author:
|
|
Whenever a property owner desires to undertake any construction activity regulated under local zoning regulations, a zoning permit is normally required. However, when the property owner cannot meet the local zoning requirements, the zoning permit must be denied by the zoning inspector. In such event, the applicant for the zoning permit can pursue a “variance” from the zoning code if the applicant does not want to change his plans to conform to the zoning requirements. Not all zoning requirements make sense for every situation. That is why zoning codes permit individuals to seek “variances” from the strict application of the zoning code.
For example, in order to preserve some valuable trees on his building lot, the applicant desires to build his home 30’ from his side yard boundary on the side of the proposed house opposite the trees. However, the zoning code requires a 40’ side yard set- back from the side lot line. The applicant will be denied a zoning permit for his planned home, unless he can obtain a variance to the 40’ requirement. Normally, in order to obtain a variance, the applicant must appeal the denial of the zoning permit to the local Board of Zoning Appeals, usually within a deadline for submitting such appeal.
The local Board of Zoning appeals will then conduct a public hearing in order to permit the applicant to present his arguments as to why a variance should be granted to him. The date, time, and place for the public hearing must be advertised in a local newspaper and usually adjacent neighbors and in some communities even nearby property owners must get notice of the public hearing. In this way, interested persons can appear at the public hearing and ask questions about the proposed variance and voice their opposition or support for the variance. Depending on the nature of the requested variance, there may be many individuals wishing to question or to comment on the request.
Getting a variance is not an easy process. There are certain legal standards which the applicant must meet in order to be entitled to a variance. Those legal standards will vary depending upon what type of variance the applicant desires. In the example above concerning a side yard variance, the applicant must demonstrate to the zoning Board of Appeals that there are “practical difficulties” involved which justify a variance. This is the test for any “area” variance and the practical difficulties test involves consideration of several different factors which have been previously identified by the courts.
If, on the other hand, the applicant wants to conduct a “use” of the property different from what the zoning code permits, a different legal test is applied to the variance request. This test is called the “unnecessary hardship” test and under it the applicant must demonstrate essentially that he cannot reasonably economically use the property as it is currently zoned. For example, an individual owns a single family home in an area zoned for residential uses only. However, several adjacent properties are operated in a commercial fashion because they are grandfathered, or because the zoning of those nearby properties is already commercial, rather than residential. This applicant might argue that due to the proximity of his home to those businesses, he cannot sell or rent his home for single family use anymore. In other words, his property is zoned residential, but it cannot reasonably be used for such purposes anymore. He may therefore be entitled to a “use” variance.
No matter what type of variance is being sought, it is important for the applicant to present all his relevant supporting evidence to the zoning board of appeals. The hearing before the zoning board is essentially a “trial.” While the presentations are rarely as formal as a court trial, nevertheless the public hearing is usually the one, best opportunity for an applicant to make his case. It is therefore critical to make a good “record” before the zoning board because if the application for the variance is denied by the board of appeals, the applicant’s only remedy is to then seek a reversal of the zoning board’s decision by the local common pleas court by way of an appeal. However, the common pleas court will only look to the “transcript” of the evidence before the zoning board to reach its decision and will usually not permit the admission of new evidence. (There are exceptions to this rule, but it is rare for additional evidence to be allowed.) It is vital to have a good “record” from the public hearing to have any hope of getting a court to reverse a zoning board of appeals. Reversals are tough, but do occur when justified.
The factual and legal complexities involved in successfully pursuing a zoning appeal are significant. A skilled and experienced zoning lawyer can help navigate the process and increase an applicant’s chances for obtaining a variance. If you need a zoning variance or other zoning permission, please contact Thrasher Dinsmore & Dolan to speak with one of our experienced zoning lawyers. The firm has years of experience representing both applicants and communities in zoning disputes.
Recent Articles
Categories
- Arbitration
- Best Lawyers in America
- Business Law
- Business Litigation
- Chardon Attorneys
- Chardon Lawyers
- Charity
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Cleveland Attorneys
- Cleveland Lawyers
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Court Cases
- Criminal Law
- Defense Attorneys
- Defense Verdicts
- Divorce Attorney
- Divorce Law
- Divorce Lawyers
- Divorce Process
- Employer Liability
- Employment Lawyers
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Family Law Attorney
- FMLA Eligibility
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Law
- Lawsuits
- Legal Advice
- Mineral Rights Lawyer
- News
- Ohio Oil and Gas
- Ohio Super Lawyers
- Oil & Gas Law
- Oil & Gas Update
- Oil and Gas Attorneys
- Personal Injury
- Personal Injury Lawyers
- Practice News
- Real Estate Lawyers
- Trial Lawyers
- Workers Compensation
- Zoning Lawyers
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2009
- June 2009
- May 2006