Subcontractors BEWARE – Ohio Supreme Court endorses “Pay-if-Paid” Clauses
Posted On:
|
Author:
|
|
It was a long standing principle of construction law in Ohio that between an owner, a contractor and subcontractors, the contractor was in the best position to gauge the economic strength of the owner and thus bore the burden if the owner went insolvent and could not fulfill its obligations under a construction contract. Further, because subcontractors often have no direct relationship or contractual agreement with the owner (called “privity”), and perform services at the request of and through the contractor, the subs have no remedy against an owner for nonpayment.
Then comes the July 17, 2014 case of Transtar Electric, Inc. v. A.E.M. Electric Services Corp., which turned all of this on its ear. In Transtar, A.E.M. was subcontracted by Transtar to install electrical systems in a pool under construction for a Holiday Inn. The owner of the hotel went insolvent, and the contractor, Transtar, refused to pay A.E.M. the final $44,000.00 of services that had been billed under the subcontract agreement between A.E.M. and Transtar (A.E.M. had been previously paid $142,000.00 for work performed prior to the owner’s insolvency).
At issue was whether or not Transtar could pass on to A.E.M. the risk of nonpayment by the owner. Previously under Ohio law, payment terms of a construction contract would not transfer such a risk unless the terms expressly provided so. For instance, prior language that was found to properly transfer the risk stated “the subcontractor expressly assumes the risk of the owner’s nonpayment and the subcontract price includes that risk.” Standard language such as “the contractor first receives payment for the subcontractor’s work before payment to the subcontractor” was previously found to be ineffective to transfer the risk of payment to the subcontractor.
The Court of Appeals had recognized that many states had found such provisions to be void as against public policy and either eliminated the practice by legislation (Illinois, Maryland and Missouri), or court order (New York and California).
However, in the Transtar case, the Ohio Supreme Court found that because the payment terms included the words “condition precedent” to the “first receives payment” language is now sufficient to evince an intent between the parties for the risk of nonpayment to be transferred to the subcontractor.
PRACTICAL POINTER: Do NOT rely upon “common practice” or prior relationships! The business world is an unfair place. Carefully read any written agreement with particular scrutiny on payment terms. Certainly take notice of anything using the words “condition precedent.” Of course, it makes greater sense to have any contract reviewed by legal counsel. A few dollars spent beforehand is money well invested to avoid a huge financial mistake later on down the road.
With offices in Chardon and Cleveland, the business services attorneys at Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan are fully capable of performing professional, thorough and cost effective review of construction and other business contracts. Please call John Liber or Ezio Listati at 440.285.2242, 216.255.5431, or e-mail: jliber@tddlaw.com, elistati@tddlaw.com.
Recent Articles
Categories
- Arbitration
- Best Lawyers in America
- Business Law
- Business Litigation
- Chardon Attorneys
- Chardon Lawyers
- Charity
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Cleveland Attorneys
- Cleveland Lawyers
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Court Cases
- Criminal Law
- Defense Attorneys
- Defense Verdicts
- Divorce Attorney
- Divorce Law
- Divorce Lawyers
- Divorce Process
- Employer Liability
- Employment Lawyers
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Family Law Attorney
- FMLA Eligibility
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Law
- Lawsuits
- Legal Advice
- Mineral Rights Lawyer
- News
- Ohio Oil and Gas
- Ohio Super Lawyers
- Oil & Gas Law
- Oil & Gas Update
- Oil and Gas Attorneys
- Personal Injury
- Personal Injury Lawyers
- Practice News
- Real Estate Lawyers
- Trial Lawyers
- Workers Compensation
- Zoning Lawyers
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2009
- June 2009
- May 2006