Supreme Court of Ohio Watch
Posted On:
|
Author:
|
|
Mary Jane Trapp of Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan, a Legal Professional Association, will regularly spotlight the most recent Ohio Supreme Court decisions affecting our clients, their businesses and their families. Mary Jane is a former appellate judge who also sat on the Supreme Court of Ohio by assignment of the chief justice. She is a frequent radio and TV commentator explaining noteworthy Ohio and United States Supreme Court cases. Here is her first installment-
Whistleblower Protection Is Not One Size Fits All
Two recent decisions from Ohio’s high court illustrate the point that “whistleblower” protection depends on the law creating the protection, and the statutes are not all alike.
The first case dealt with the intersection and interpretation of two statutes. The first, R.C. 3721.22, sets outs the responsibilities for reporting suspected abuse and neglect of residents in a long-term care or residential care facility to the Ohio director of health and provides protection to the reporter from civil lawsuits and criminal charges. The second, R.C. 3721.24, protects the reporter from retaliation by the employer.
In a 6-1 decision, the court examined these two statutes and held that an employee or other person who works or provides services at these types of facilities does not have to actually make a report of or show the intent to report suspected abuse or neglect to the Ohio director of health to be able to bring a retaliation claim under the statute.
Justice French dissented. In her view the whistleblower statute, R.C. 3721.24, is ambiguously silent about who is to receive such reports, so the statute should be interpreted to require a report to the director of the department of health or else one could simply report it to a friend and then be entitled to protection.
The second case dealt with the whistleblower statute found at R.C. 4113.52. Justice French, this time writing for the 5-2 majority, found that a village employee was not entitled to protection for reporting problems at a wastewater treatment plant because he did not strictly comply with the statutory reporting requirements. For example, she determined that while the employee reported “equipment failures,” that report did not qualify as a report that “sufficiently identifies any crimes involving the village.”
The take away from these two recent decisions is that employers and employees facing potential whistleblower issues should consult with counsel early on to test their particular set of facts against the correct law.
The full opinions may be found at
Hulsmeyer v. Hospice of Southwest Ohio, Inc., 2014-Ohio-5511 https://www.sc.ohio.gov/ROD/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-Ohio-5511.pdf
Lee v. Village of Cardington, 2014-Ohio 5458 http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-Ohio-5458.pdf
For more information or help with your case, please contact Mary Jane at mjtrapp@tddlaw.com or 216-255-5431.
Recent Articles
Categories
- Arbitration
- Best Lawyers in America
- Business Law
- Business Litigation
- Chardon Attorneys
- Chardon Lawyers
- Charity
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Cleveland Attorneys
- Cleveland Lawyers
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Court Cases
- Criminal Law
- Defense Attorneys
- Defense Verdicts
- Divorce Attorney
- Divorce Law
- Divorce Lawyers
- Divorce Process
- Employer Liability
- Employment Lawyers
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Family Law Attorney
- FMLA Eligibility
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Law
- Lawsuits
- Legal Advice
- Mineral Rights Lawyer
- News
- Ohio Oil and Gas
- Ohio Super Lawyers
- Oil & Gas Law
- Oil & Gas Update
- Oil and Gas Attorneys
- Personal Injury
- Personal Injury Lawyers
- Practice News
- Real Estate Lawyers
- Trial Lawyers
- Workers Compensation
- Zoning Lawyers
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2009
- June 2009
- May 2006