Transitioning from Judge to Advocate
Posted On:
|
Author:
|
|
By
Mary Jane Trapp (mjtrapp@tddlaw.com) is a principal of Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan, a legal professional association in Cleveland, Ohio. She previously served as a judge on the Eleventh District Court of Appeals and as a visiting judge on the Supreme Court of Ohio and in four sister districts across the state.
It was the night before my first oral argument since leaving the appellate bench, and I could not sleep. It had been more than eight years since I last stood before a three-judge panel. I knew the record cold even though I had been retained on appeal. The trial attorneys did their job making the record. Errors were preserved, proffers made so I would not have to argue the dreaded plain error. I knew the controlling cases from memory, good and bad. In fact, I wrote one of the opinions on the same issue. I knew my appellate panel. I was elated to find the trial judge who wrote the seminal cases sitting on my panel. Knowing that judges enthusiastically discuss their own cases in argument, I was relieved that I would not have to distinguish this judge’s cases away.
So, why was I having so much trouble sleeping? Then it hit me. As a judge, I was a reputed “active” questioner. The give and take is not only intellectually challenging, but it has real value because it gives the panel an opportunity to clarify an issue or correct a misapprehension. With a “hot bench” (hot because a draft opinion has been written before oral argument, not because the panel looks great), I had seen opinion outcomes change after argument.
It finally hit me—I was fearful I would start throwing questions to the panel as I had done these past years instead of fielding them.
The briefing, though, did come easier to me because I know firsthand what appellate judges want in a brief: a succinct statement of only necessary facts, a reminder of the standard of review, and correct statements of the law without ad hominem attacks on the other side or counsel.
But even the briefing posed a few problems for me until I was able to regain my inner advocate. As a new judge, I had to make a conscious effort in opinion writing to become a neutral, allowing the facts and law to dictate the result. When I sat staring at a screen having difficulty writing, I forced myself to step back, knowing I might be slipping into result-oriented mode. We had a saying in my chambers: “When it will not write, it cannot be right”—it could not be correct because you are attempting to massage the facts and law to reach a certain result.
As I wrote more opinions, the neutral style of writing became second nature, so when I returned to practice I had to work to rewire my brain and recapture the passionate writing style that separates good briefs from stellar briefs.
But the most difficult part of my transition was determining where and how I wanted to practice. The practice of law had changed substantially in eight years. Trial lawyers were now routinely doing their own appeals because of the pressure to find and retain clients. I had to learn the current litigation trends. By the time an appellate judge sees a trend, it is no longer a trend. And then there is marketing. When I recognized that practice marketing is a lot like retail politics (a skill I had to learn in a state that elects its judges), the task became easier. I began attending more bar association events, volunteering to teach CLEs and write articles. I transformed political campaign literature into marketing materials.
And the best part of the transition was being able to work with clients again. Helping a client navigate through business or personal misery to reach a good result is why I still love what I do.
Recent Articles
Categories
- Arbitration
- Best Lawyers in America
- Business Law
- Business Litigation
- Chardon Attorneys
- Chardon Lawyers
- Charity
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Cleveland Attorneys
- Cleveland Lawyers
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Court Cases
- Criminal Law
- Defense Attorneys
- Defense Verdicts
- Divorce Attorney
- Divorce Law
- Divorce Lawyers
- Divorce Process
- Employer Liability
- Employment Lawyers
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Family Law Attorney
- FMLA Eligibility
- Insurance Coverage
- Insurance Law
- Lawsuits
- Legal Advice
- Mineral Rights Lawyer
- News
- Ohio Oil and Gas
- Ohio Super Lawyers
- Oil & Gas Law
- Oil & Gas Update
- Oil and Gas Attorneys
- Personal Injury
- Personal Injury Lawyers
- Practice News
- Real Estate Lawyers
- Trial Lawyers
- Workers Compensation
- Zoning Lawyers
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2009
- June 2009
- May 2006